Association in Art and Photography: A Glimpse into Visual Interpretation

When we look at a photograph or a painting, something almost magical happens. We don’t just see it—we feel something, remember something, connect it to something we’ve lived through. That quiet, often unnoticed process is called association, and it plays a powerful role in how we experience visual art.

But is that just our imagination? Or is there real weight behind the way our minds connect images to memories, feelings, or ideas?

Art as a Mirror: Interpreting Through Association

Minor White, one of the great voices in 20th-century photography, once said:

“Let associations rise like a flock of birds from a field.” (White, Aperture, 1959)

That phrase captures something essential about how we interpret what we see. Association isn’t about finding the “correct” meaning. It’s about engaging personally with an image—responding with our own emotions, memories, and even subconscious thoughts. White believed that each photograph offers as many right answers as there are viewers. There’s no single truth. Only what the viewer experiences.

Not Random, But Deeply Human

Art theorist Walter Abell echoed this idea, emphasizing that associations are not irrelevant distractions—they are central to our experience of art.

“No association is by nature inherently irrelevant to the experience of art, provided it fuses with the other phases of that experience and so becomes an integral part of it.” (Abell, Representation and Form, 1936)

In other words, our interpretations aren’t mistakes. They’re part of the artwork’s life. We see form, we feel emotion, and somewhere between the two, meaning is born.

Even beyond the emotional, our brains are wired to make connections. Anton Ehrenzweig described this beautifully in his essay on creativity and perception:

“The brain projects definite configuration onto the chaos which we perceive as the forms and shapes around us.” (Ehrenzweig, “Unconscious Form Creation in Art,” 1947)

Whether it’s a dot on a canvas or a blur in a photograph, we instinctively search for patterns, symbols, stories. Our minds don’t wait for permission—they leap into meaning-making.

So, Is It All Just Subjective?

In a way, yes—and that’s what makes it so human. Meaning in art is not fixed. It shifts depending on who’s looking, what they’ve been through, what they carry with them. Association is what transforms a still image into something alive. It’s what makes art personal.

The quotes and ideas compiled in this paper remind us that every viewer brings something to the frame. And that something—however subtle or fleeting—is valid.

📖 Want to read the full paper? We’ve collected these insights from some of the most thoughtful minds in art and visual theory. Contact Us to request the complete paper and explore this topic in greater depth.

Download Full Paper

References

• White, M. (1959). Aperture Magazine

• Abell, W. (1936). Representation and Form

• Ehrenzweig, A. (1947). “Unconscious Form Creation in Art,” British Journal of Medical Psychology, XXI